Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Falls et al v. Torrent Pharma, Inc. et al
as 2:2024at00598
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Falls and Tom Falls
Defendant:
Torrent Pharma, Inc., Torrent Pharmaceuticals, Ltd and CVS Health Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Falls et al v. Torrent Pharmaceuticals, Ltd et al
as 2:2024cv01370
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Falls and Tom Falls
Defendant:
Torrent Pharmaceuticals, Ltd, Torrent Pharma, Inc. and CVS Health Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Leonhart v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 2:2020cv01677
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, C R Bard Inc, DOES 1 through 100, inclusive and others
Plaintiff:
Tom Leonhart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 nr
Curry v. Heid, et al.
as 1:2013cv01425
Plaintiff:
Clifford E. Curry, Sr.
Defendant:
Tom Heid , Richard Mehaffey and United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Curry v. Heid, et al.
as 2:2013cv01789
Plaintiff:
Clifford E. Curry, Sr.
Defendant:
Tom Heid , Richard Mehaffey and United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Curry v. Heid, et al.
as 1:2013cv01382
Plaintiff:
Clifford E. Curry, Sr.
Defendant:
Tom Heid , Richard Mehaffey and United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Bane et al v. Taylor et al
as 2:2011at01312
Plaintiff:
Carol Bane and Kelly Lind
Defendant:
Lois Jane Taylor, Frances N. Taylor and Tom R Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bane et al v. Taylor et al
as 2:2011cv02426
Plaintiff:
Carol Bane and Kelly Lind
Defendant:
Lois Jane Taylor , Frances N. Taylor and Tom R Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sayles v. City of Lathrop et al
as 2:2009cv03564
Plaintiff:
Tom Sayles
Defendant:
City of Lathrop, Ron Rhodes and Dan Mac Neilage
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sayles v. City of Lathrop et al
as 2:2009at02065
Plaintiff:
Tom Sayles
Defendant:
City of Lathrop, Ron Rhodes and Dan Mac Neilage
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
