Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Permanente Medical Group, Inc. et al v. Engineers and Scientists of California, Local 20, International Federation of Professional and Technical Engineers, AFL-CIO & CLC
as 1:2022cv00596
Plaintiff:
The Permanente Medical Group, Inc., Kaiser Foundation Hospitals and Permanente Medical Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Engineers and Scientists of California, Local 20, International Federation of Professional and Technical Engineers, AFL-CIO & CLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Employee Pension Plan
The Permanente Medical Group, Inc. et al v. Engineers and Scientists of California, Local 20, International Federation of Professional and Technical Engineers, AFL-CIO & CLC
as 1:2022at00354
Plaintiff:
The Permanente Medical Group, Inc. and Kaiser Foundation Hospitals
Defendant:
Engineers and Scientists of California, Local 20, International Federation of Professional and Technical Engineers, AFL-CIO & CLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Employee Pension Plan
United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, AFL-CIO Local 2350 v. Service Employees International Union, Local 1000
as 2:2018cv00134
Plaintiff:
United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, AFL-CIO Local 2350
Defendant:
Service Employees International Union, Local 1000
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
United Steel, Paper & Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial & Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO, CLC v. Lehigh Southwest Cement Company, Inc., et al.,
as 2:2017cv00412
Plaintiff:
United Steel, Paper & Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial & Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO, CLC
Defendant:
Lehigh Southwest Cement Company, Inc. and Lehigh Hanson Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 185
Bakery Confectionery Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers International Union AFL-CIO Local 85 v. Raley's
as 2:2010cv01574
Petitioner:
Bakery Confectionery Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers International Union AFL-CIO Local 85
Respondent:
Raley's
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Bakery Confectionery Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers International Union AFL-CIO Local 85 v. Raley's
as 2:2010at00841
Petitioner:
- Bakery Confectionery Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers International Union AFL-CIO Local 85
Respondent:
Raley's
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Gilb, et al v. John Chiang, et al
as 2:2008cv01960
Intervenor Defendant:
California Correctional Peace Officers Association, California Correctional Peace Officers Association, California Statewide Law Enforcement Association and others
Petitioner:
David A. Gilb and Department of Personnel Administration
Respondent:
John Chiang and Office of the State Controller
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gilb et al v. California Correctional Peace Officers Association et al
as 2:2008at00972
Intervenor Defendant:
California Correctional Peace Officers Association, California Statewide Law Enforcement Association, Stationary Engineers Local 39 International Union Of Operating Engineers, AFL-CIO and others
Petitioner:
David A Gilb and Department of Personnel Administration
Respondent:
John Chiang and Office of the State Controller
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 684 Health and Welfare Trust et al v. Omstead Electric Construction et al
as 2:2008cv01124
Plaintiff:
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 684 Health and Welfare Trust, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 684 Health and Welfare Trust, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 684 Labor & Management Cooperative Trust and others
Defendant:
Omstead Electric Construction and Robert P. Omstead
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Operating Engineers Local Union No. 3, AFL-CIO v. Kroeker, Inc.
as 1:2008cv00411
Plaintiff:
Operating Engineers Local Union No. 3, AFL-CIO
Defendant:
Kroeker, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
