Cases 231 - 240 of 268
Maiso Lee v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2007cv00416
Plaintiff:
Maiso Lee
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Vargas v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2007cv00411
Plaintiff:
Pedro Vargas
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Herron v CSS
as 2:2007cv00465
Plaintiff:
Jerry J Herron
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue and Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Herron
as 2:2007at00222
Plaintiff:
Jerry J Herron
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Brashier v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2007cv00375
Plaintiff:
Barbara Brashier
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue and Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Woods v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2007cv00378
Plaintiff:
Arlen Ray Woods
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue and Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Isaac v. Astrue
as 2:2007cv00442
Plaintiff:
Seymour Isaac
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue and Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Ann Carolyn Long v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2007cv00346
Plaintiff:
Ann Carolyn Long
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue, Michael J. Astrue and U.S. Attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Keokham v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2007cv00426
Plaintiff:
Phouk Keokham
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue and Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Heath v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2007cv00312
Plaintiff:
Michael Heath
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue and Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
