Cases 61 - 70 of 569
Lapin v. Springer et al
as 3:2022cv02980
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Lapin
Defendant:
Daniel D. Springer, Enrique Salem, Peter Solvik and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Sanetel et al v. Boyd et al
as 3:2022cv02868
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Sanetel and Vijayendra Gururaja
Defendant:
Steven J. Boyd, Todd C. Davis, Cezar Andrei Floroiu and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Derycke v. Tzuo et al
as 3:2022cv02775
Plaintiff:
Theresa Derycke
Defendant:
Tien Tzuo, Tyler Sloat, Marc Diouane and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Barker v. Floroiu et al
as 3:2022cv02728
Plaintiff:
Stephen Barker
Defendant:
Andrei Floroiu, Todd Davis, Michael J. Finney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Stockholders Suits
Suri v. Kelly et al
as 4:2022cv02080
Defendant:
Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings, Inc., Jason Kelly, Soaring Eagle Acquisition Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Naresh Suri
Nguyen v. Hobbs et al
as 4:2022cv01693
Plaintiff:
Trung Nguyen
Defendant:
Eric D. Hobbs, Shaun M. Holt, Kurt Wood and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Stang v. Teal Drones, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01586
Plaintiff:
Robert Stang
Defendant:
Teal Drones, Inc. and George Matus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Stockholders Suits
Gervat v. Zuckerberg et al
as 4:2022cv01206
Plaintiff:
Hughes Gervat
Defendant:
Mark Zuckerberg, David Wehner, Nick Clegg and others
Intervenor:
Employees' Retirement System of the State of Rhode Island, St. Paul Electrical Construction Pension Plan, St. Paul Electrical Construction Workers Supplemental Pension Plan (2014 Restatement) and others
Choi v. Rosensweig. et al
as 5:2022cv00217
Plaintiff:
Rak Joon Choi
Defendant:
Chegg, Inc., Daniel Rosensweig, Andrew Brown and others
Pang v. PayPal Holdings, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv09720
Plaintiff:
Shang Pang
Defendant:
PayPal Holdings, Inc., Daniel H Schulman, John D. Rainey and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
