Cases 31 - 40 of 607
Carrington Stonemasons, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company
as 5:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Carrington Stonemasons, Inc.
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tran et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 5:2023cv06539
Plaintiff:
Connie Tran and Lam Le
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Winston v. Ford Motor Company
as 5:2024cv00621
Plaintiff:
Roger Winston
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Rathman et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 3:2023cv06628
Plaintiff:
Barry Rathman and Christine Rathman
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and Livermore Auto Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tapia v. Ford Motor Company et al.
as 5:2024cv00672
Plaintiff:
Michael Tapia
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and North Bay Ford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Harwood v. Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC
as 3:2024cv00147
Plaintiff:
Keirin Harwood
Defendant:
Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Williams v. Ford Motor Company
as 3:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Vernon Williams
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Magana v. Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC
as 3:2024cv00283
Plaintiff:
Frank Magana
Defendant:
Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 5:2023cv06540
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Smith
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and Walnut Creek Ford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hyland v. Ford Motor Company
as 3:2023cv06214
Plaintiff:
Patricia Hyland
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
