Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Doe et al v. The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company, L.L.C. et al
as 3:2023cv05218
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe and John Doe
Defendant:
The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company, L.L.C. and Marriott International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
John Doe I et al v. Cerebral, Inc.
as 4:2023cv02239
Plaintiff:
John Doe I and John Doe II
Defendant:
Cerebral, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Roe v. Doe
as 4:2023cv01099
Plaintiff:
Jane Roe
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Doe v. GoodRx Holdings, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00501
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe, E. C., Jose Marquez and others
Defendant:
GoodRx Holdings, Inc., Criteo Corp., Meta Platforms Inc. and others
Petitioner:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jones et al v. Sunbelt Rentals, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv05954
Plaintiff:
RHAYNA ROSE JONES, JACOBY JR. JONES, RYAN JONES and others
Defendant:
Sunbelt Rentals, Inc., DC SOLAR, INC., JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Guidel v. City of San Leandro et al
as 4:2021cv01379
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Guidel
Defendant:
John Doe and City of San Leandro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. Twitter, Inc.
as 3:2021cv00485
Defendant:
Twitter, Inc.
Plaintiff:
John Doe and B.M.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Clements v. JUUL LABS, INC. et al
as 3:2019cv06908
Defendant:
Altria Group Inc., Philip Morris USA Inc, ABC CORPORATION 1-50 and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Clements
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Amy et al v. Curtis
as 4:2019cv02184
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE, MYA, VIOLET and others
Defendant:
Randall Steven Curtis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lily et al v. Jones
as 3:2019cv01897
Plaintiff:
Jessica, Jane Doe, Ava and others
Defendant:
Gerard Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.