Cases 61 - 70 of 138
Klahn et al v. Equity Lifestyle Properties, Inc.
as 3:2012cv02743
Plaintiff:
Daniel P. Klahn and Laurie A. Klahn
Defendant:
Equity Lifestyle Properties, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Klahn et al v. Citicorp Credit Services, Inc. (USA)
as 4:2012cv02741
Plaintiff:
Daniel P. Klahn and Laurie A. Klahn
Defendant:
Citicorp Credit Services, Inc. (USA)
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Bilbaeno v. GE Money Bank et al
as 3:2012cv01234
Plaintiff:
Carolina Bilbaeno
Defendant:
GE Money Bank, Westwood Associates, WMC Mmortgage Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Biotherm Hydronic, Inc. v. Kemna Enterprises et al
as 3:2012cv01206
Plaintiff:
Biotherm Hydronic, Inc.
Defendant:
Kemna Enterprises and Satellite Specialized Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Klahn et al v. Santander Consumer USA, Inc.
as 3:2012cv00836
Plaintiff:
Laurie A. Klahn and Daniel P. Klahn, Sr.
Defendant:
Santander Consumer USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BNSF Logistics, LLC v. L & N Express, Inc.
as 4:2011cv05810
Plaintiff:
BNSF Logistics, LLC
Defendant:
L & N Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BNSF Logistics, LLC v. L & N Express, Inc.
as 3:2011cv05810
Plaintiff:
BNSF Logistics, LLC
Defendant:
L & N Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Reeves & Associates, PLC v. Muller
as 3:2011cv04762
Plaintiff:
Reeves & Associates, PLC
Defendant:
Matthew D. Muller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Canadian National Railway Company v. Phoenix Logistics, Inc.
as 3:2011cv04589
Plaintiff:
Canadian National Railway Company
Defendant:
Phoenix Logistics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robinson Rancheria of Pomo Indians of California v. Quitiquit et al
as 4:2011cv04348
Plaintiff:
Robinson Rancheria of Pomo Indians of California
Defendant:
Luwana Quitiquit, Robert Quitiquit, Karen Ramos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.