Cases 1 - 10 of 1,393
Henke v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv03841
Plaintiff:
Michael Henke
Defendant:
Comm'r of Soc. Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Kitchen v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv03740
Plaintiff:
Erica Jean Kitchen
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley and SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Tetler v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv03728
Plaintiff:
Michael Tetler
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Richardson
as 5:2024cv03734
Plaintiff:
Clarence A. Richardson
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA Martin O'Malley and SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Ortiz v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv03670
Plaintiff:
Michael Ortiz
Defendant:
Comm'r of Soc. Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Gonzales v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv03378
Plaintiff:
Echo Regina Gonzales
Defendant:
Comm'r of Soc. Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Morales v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv03396
Plaintiff:
Randy Morales
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley and SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Saechao v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv03289
Plaintiff:
Kownai Saechao
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Perez v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv02145
Plaintiff:
Fidel Rodriguez Perez
Defendant:
Comm'r of Soc. Martin J. O'Malley and SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Karasik-Tosk v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv03108
Plaintiff:
Regina Karasik-Tosk
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
