Contract Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of California
Cases 1 - 10 of 89
Uber Technologies, Inc. et al v. CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS, LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO POLICY NO. B0146CYUSA1400432 et al
as 3:2024cv00442
Plaintiff: Uber Technologies, Inc. and Raiser, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company
Defendant: CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS, LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO POLICY NO. B0146CYUSA1400432 doing business as Principia Underwriters and CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS, LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO POLICY NO. B0146CYUSA1400588 doing business as Aspen Insurance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Type: Contract Insurance
Underwriters at Lloyds Insuring Western Digital Technologies, Inc. Under Policy Number FAL-2000055 et al., v. Flexport International, LLC
as 3:2023cv02268
Plaintiff: UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS INSURING WESTERN DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. UNDER POLICY NUMBER FAL-2000055, and WESTERN DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,, Underwriters at Lloyds Insuring Western Digital Technologies, Inc. Under Policy Number FAL-2000055 and Western Digital Technologies, Inc.
Defendant: FLEXPORT INTERNATIONAL, LLC, and Flexport International, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Great American Insurance Company of New York v. Hapag-Lloyd (America) Inc et al
as 3:2022cv07065
Plaintiff: Great American Insurance Company of New York
Defendant: Hapag-Lloyd (America) Inc and Hapag-Lloyd Aktiengesellschaft
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
Great American Insurance Company of New York v. Hapag-Lloyd Aktiengesellschaft et al
as 3:2022cv07070
Plaintiff: Great American Insurance Company of New York
Defendant: Hapag-Lloyd Aktiengesellschaft and Hapag-Lloyd (America) Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
Calistoga Ranch Owner LLC et al v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv03188
Plaintiff: Calistoga Ranch Owner LLC, Calistoga Ranch Investors LLC and Calistoga Ranch Club
Defendant: Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, International Insurance Company of Hannover SE N/K/A HDI Global Specialty SE and Premier Claims Management LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's Subscribing to Policy No. MC90000221WC90000221 v. Integrity Express Logistics et al.
as 4:2022cv03200
Plaintiff: Certain Underwriters at Lloyds and Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's Subscribing to Policy No. MC90000221WC90000221
Defendant: Integrity Express Logistics, KSN Trans Inc and GMB Transport Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
United Brands Products Design Development&Marketing, Inc. v. Certain Underwriters At Lloyd's London Denoted As Syndicate Numbers AFB 2623 and AFB 623 We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv00649
Plaintiff: United Brands Products Design Development&Marketing, Inc.
Defendant: Certain Underwriters At Lloyd's London Denoted As Syndicate Numbers AFB 2623 and AFB 623
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
PEAG LLC et al v. Flexport International LLC
as 3:2021cv09376
Plaintiff: PEAG LLC and Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London
Defendant: Flexport International LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London Subscribing To Policy No. B1510MA000012F v. Starlink Freight System (Sfo), Inc.
as 3:2021cv08361
Plaintiff: Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London Subscribing To Policy No. B1510MA000012F
Defendant: Starlink Freight System (Sfo), Inc.
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81
Assertio Therapeutics, Inc. v. Lloyd's of London Newline Syndicate 1218 et al
as 3:2021cv06642
Plaintiff: Assertio Therapeutics, Inc.
Defendant: Lloyd's of London Syndicate Number 01218, Newline Underwriting Management Limited, Newline Corporate Name LTD. (UK) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?