Cases 1 - 10 of 3,686
Morrison v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv06584
Plaintiff:
Michael Dennis Morrison
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Love v. O'Malley Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv06590
Plaintiff:
Desmond Earl Love
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Taber v. O'Malley Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv06533
Plaintiff:
Bryan Taber
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Yitik v. O'Malley Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv06488
Plaintiff:
Ayhan Yitik
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Johnson v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv06481
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Clarence Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Karamese v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv06453
Defendant:
SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF) and Commissioner of SSA Martin O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Hatiche N. Karamese
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Kaur v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv06474
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Jaskaranjit Kaur
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Penny v. O'Malley et al
as 3:2024cv06465
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA Martin O'Malley and Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Jalissa Penny
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Murrie v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv06440
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Murrie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Cooper v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv06383
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Plaintiff:
Robert Monroe Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
