Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Mock v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv06586
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY MATTHEW MOCK
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security, Social Security Administration, Kilolo Kijakazi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Nelson v. Kijakazi
as 5:2023cv05355
Plaintiff:
Matthew Nelson
Defendant:
Kilolo, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Kijakazi, Kilolo Kijakazi and SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
McIntyre v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv02408
Plaintiff:
Matthew McIntyre
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Sullivan v. Kijakazi
as 4:2022cv05327
Plaintiff:
Matthew James Sullivan
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Walker v. Kijakazi
as 3:2022cv03935
Plaintiff:
Mr. Walker Landick Matthew and Matthew Landick Walker
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Higgins v. Kijakazi
as 3:2021cv07897
Plaintiff:
Matthew Joseph Higgins
Defendant:
Social Security Commissioner, Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Nodoline v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 3:2021cv05129
Plaintiff:
Mr. Matthew John Nodoline
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Morrow v. Berryhill
as 3:2018cv04641
Plaintiff:
Matthew C Morrow and Matthew C. Morrow
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Morrow v. Berryhill
as 5:2018cv04641
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Matthew C Morrow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Freeman v. Berryhill
as 4:2017cv02279
Plaintiff:
Matthew Ray Freeman
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
