Cases 11 - 20 of 92
COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, a political subdivision of the State of California et al v. McKinsey and Company, Inc.
as 3:2022cv06448
Plaintiff:
COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, a political subdivision of the State of California and THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, acting by and through the COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA
Defendant:
McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
CITY OF LAKEPORT, CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation et al v. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, acting by and through the CITY OF LAKEPORT et al
as 1:2022cv06467
Plaintiff:
CITY OF LAKEPORT, CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation, COUNTY OF MENDOCINO, a political subdivision of the State of California and THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, acting by and through the COUNTY OF MENDOCINO
Defendant:
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, acting by and through the CITY OF LAKEPORT and McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
San Benito County et al v. McKinsey and Company, Inc.
as 3:2022cv06302
Plaintiff:
San Benito County, City Of San Jose, The People of the State of California, acting by and through the County of San Benito and others
Defendant:
McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Kwan et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2022mc80025
Plaintiff:
Turo Inc.
Petitioner:
ERIC KWAN, ANDRAS SMULOVICS and ANDREY KORNAKOV
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles
Respondent:
Uber Technologies, Inc.
Counter Claimant:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, on its own behalf and on behalf of the People of the State of California
People of the State of California v. EVIG, LLC
as 4:2021cv02330
Defendant:
EVIG, LLC
Plaintiff:
People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
People of the State of California v. United States Department of Education et al
as 3:2021cv00384
Defendant:
United States Department of Education and Mitchell Zais
Plaintiff:
People of the State of California
Intervenor:
National Student Legal Defense Network
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
City of Clearlake et al v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv06212
Defendant:
Allergan PLC, Actavis Pharma, Inc., McKesson Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
City of Clearlake and The People of the State of California, by and through the City of Clearlake
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
People of the State of California v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
as 4:2020cv05860
Defendant:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Plaintiff:
People of the State of California, Attorney State of Minnesota, District of Columbia and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156
Cummings-Breithaupt v. Vitol Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv05349
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH CUMMINGS-BREITHAUPT
Defendant:
SK Trading International Co. Ltd, Vitol Inc. and SK Energy Americas Inc.
Interested Party:
Pacific Wine Distributors, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
The People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Burg v. Vitol Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv05246
Defendant:
SK Trading International Co. Ltd., SK Energy Americas Inc. and Vitol Inc.
Plaintiff:
Myra Burg
Not Classified By Court:
The People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
