Cases 1 - 10 of 112
Ravinder Singh v. DHS et al
as 3:2024cv03880
Plaintiff:
Fnu Ravinder Singh
Defendant:
DHS, Ur Mendoza Jaddou USCIS Director and USCIS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Singh et al v. United States Department of Agriculture
as 3:2024cv03293
Plaintiff:
Daryn M. Singh, Deepak Singh and Lila Singh
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Singh et al v. United States Department of Agriculture
as 3:2024cv01539
Plaintiff:
Inderjit Singh and Sarbjeet Kaur
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
In re Naturalization Ceremony 03/13/24
as 5:2024mc80052
Not Yet Classified:
Naturalization Ceremony, Refal Hussein Ali Al Mhaoush, Damon Jay Civin and others
Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Highrise Advantage, LLC et al
as 5:2023mc80316
Plaintiff:
Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Defendant:
Highrise Advantage, LLC, Bull Run Advantage, LLC, Green Knight Investments, LLC and others
Singh v. Garland et al
as 3:2023cv05267
Plaintiff:
Ashok Singh
Defendant:
Merrick B Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas and Kenneth T. Cuccinelli
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Singh v. USCIS et al
as 3:2023cv04410
Plaintiff:
Nishan Singh
Defendant:
USCIS, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, USCIS Nebraska Service Center and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
In re Naturalization Ceremony 6/30/2023
as 3:2023mc80168
In Re:
Naturalization Ceremony, Mohammad Ebrahim Ahmadi, Naqibullah Ahmadzai and others
Kusen v. Herbert, II et al
as 3:2023cv02940
Plaintiff:
Alexandra Kusen, McCadden Investments, LLC and Strategic Capital Investments, LLC
Defendant:
James H. Herbert, II, Hafize Gaye Erkan, Michael J. Roffler and others
Petitioner:
Rami E. Geffner, The Investor Group, Philippe D. Katz and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
