Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Vaughan et al v. Wardhaugh et al
as 4:2023cv02879
Plaintiff:
Matthew V. Vaughan and Amy A. Vaughan
Defendant:
Russell L. Wardhaugh, Amanda N. Wardhaugh, Castlewood Brokers, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv04735
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv04735
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv04576
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv04657
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams et al v. Federal National Mortgage Association
as 4:2016cv05366
Plaintiff:
Warren Williams , Nita Williams and Denise Ransom
Defendant:
Federal National Mortgage Association
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Gauthier v. Seterus, Inc et al
as 4:2014cv05045
Defendant:
Seterus, Inc , Federal National Mortgage Association , Residential Mortgage Services and others
Plaintiff:
Margaret L Gauthier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Banegas v. Washington Mutual Bank, F.A. et al
as 5:2012cv03807
Plaintiff:
Oscar Banegas
Defendant:
Washington Mutual Bank, F.A., California Reconveyance Company, Fidelity National Title and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chandler v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 4:2011cv03831
Plaintiff:
Robert Chandler
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Federal National Mortgage Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chandler v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 3:2011cv03831
Plaintiff:
Robert Chandler
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Federal National Mortgage Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
