Cases 1 - 10 of 67
Williams et al v. Ethicon Women's Health and Urology et al
as 4:2021cv04285
Defendant:
ETHICON WOMENS HEALTH AND UROLOGY, a Division of ETHICON, INC, GYNECARE, a Division of ETHICON, INC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL WILLIAMS and DAWN WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miramontez v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 4:2021cv01762
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Helen Miramontez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Christie v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv03734
Plaintiff:
Rita Christie and Leslie Christie
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jacobson et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv03002
Plaintiff:
Kristin Lynn Jacobson and Eric Christopher Jacobson
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc, Coloplast Corp., and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boreni et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv03001
Plaintiff:
Patricia Boreni and Alan Boreni
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gueret-Negash et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv01677
Plaintiff:
Sally Gueret-Negash and Girma Negash
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bell et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2019cv02408
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Jean Bell and Steven Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sunseri v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 5:2017cv05662
Plaintiff:
Cindy Sunseri
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon Inc., Ethicon US, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Taylor v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2015cv02712
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health & Urology Division of Ethicon, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Karen L. Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Robbins v. Ethicon Inc.
as 4:2014cv04861
Plaintiff:
Fred Robbins
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
