Cases 1 - 10 of 216
Villarreal et al v. Salesforce.com, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00813
Plaintiff:
David Villarreal, Joseph Douillard, Chris Simonelli and others
Defendant:
Salesforce.com, Inc., Board of Directors of Salesforce.com, Inc., Marc Benioff and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits
District Council 16 Northern California Health and Welfare Trust Fund et al v. Alliance Glass Company LLC
as 3:2024cv00152
Plaintiff:
District Council 16 Northern California Health and Welfare Trust Fund, Northern California Glaziers, Architectural Metal and Glass Workers Pension Trust Fund, Northern California Glaziers Individual Account Retirement Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
Alliance Glass Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
District Council 16 Northern California Health and Welfare Trust Fund et al v. All Bay Area Glass
as 3:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
District Council 16 Northern California Health and Welfare Trust Fund, Northern California Glaziers, Architectural Metal and Glass Workers Pension Trust Fund, Northern California Glaziers Individual Account Retirement Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
All Bay Area Glass
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
District Council 16 Northern California Health and Welfare Trust Fund et al v. Bay Area Tintworks, Inc.
as 3:2023cv06614
Plaintiff:
District Council 16 Northern California Health and Welfare Trust Fund, Robert Williams, John Maggiore and others
Defendant:
Bay Area Tintworks, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
District Council 16 Northern California Health and Welfare Trust Fund et al v. Quality Glass, Inc.
as 4:2023cv05204
Plaintiff:
District Council 16 Northern California Health and Welfare Trust Fund, Robert Williams, John Maggiore and others
Defendant:
Quality Glass, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Mullins et al v. International Brotherhood Teamsters et al
as 3:2023cv03939
Plaintiff:
Thomsa Neal Mullins and John R. Scholz, III
Defendant:
International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Sean O'Brien, Teamsters Local 986 and others
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151 Railway Labor Act
District Council 16 Northern California Health and Welfare Trust Fund et al v. JJ RC, Enterprises, Inc.
as 4:2023cv03837
Plaintiff:
District Council 16 Northern California Health and Welfare Trust Fund, Northern California Glaziers, Architectural Metal and Glass Workers Pension Trust Fund, Northern California Glaziers Individual Account Retirement Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
JJ RC, Enterprises, Inc. and JJ RC, Enterprises, Inc. a California Corporation doing business as Window Covering Specialist
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
C. v. Aetna Health and Life Insurance Company et al
as 3:2023cv03786
Plaintiff:
Chris C.
Defendant:
Aetna Health and Life Insurance Company and Major League Baseball Players Benefit Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits
District Council 16 Northern California Health and Welfare Trust Fund et al v. Enclos Corp.
as 4:2023cv03526
Plaintiff:
District Council 16 Northern California Health and Welfare Trust Fund, Northern California Glaziers, Architectural Metal and Glass Workers Pension Trust Fund, Northern California Glaziers Individual Account Retirement Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
Enclos Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
District Council 16 Northern California Health and Welfare Trust Fund et al v. Combos Glass, Inc.
as 3:2023cv02301
Plaintiff:
District Council 16 Northern California Health and Welfare Trust Fund, Northern California Glaziers, Architectural Metal and Glass Workers Pension Plan, Northern California Glaziers Individual Account Retirement Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
Combos Glass, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
