Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of California
Cases 11 - 20 of 174
Dell Inc. et al v. Philips Electronics North America Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv02171
Plaintiff: Dell Inc. and Dell Products L.P.
Defendant: Philips Electronics North America Corporation, Philips Electronics Industries (Taiwan) Ltd, Philips da Amazonia Industria Electronica Ltda and others
Pecial_master: Charles A. Legge
Creditor: Hitachi Asia, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
Thompson et al v. Toshiba Corporation et al
as 4:2013cv00784
Plaintiff: Dawn Thompson , Robert Alan Dishman , Joan Goodman and others
Defendant: Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba America Inc, Toshiba America Electronic Components Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Sharp Electronics Corporation et al v. Hitachi, Ltd. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv01173
Plaintiff: Sharp Electronics Corporation and Sharp Electronics Manufacturing Company of America, Inc.
Defendant: Hitachi, Ltd., Hitachi Displays, Ltd., Hitachi America, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Tech Data Corporation et al v. Hitachi, Ltd. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv00157
Plaintiff: Tech Data Corporation and Tech Data Product Management, Inc.
Defendant: Hitachi, Ltd., Hitachi Displays, Ltd., Hitachi America Ltd and others
Pecial_master: Charles A. Legge
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
The State of California by its Attorney General Kamala D. Harris and the City and County of San Francisco Ex Rel Dennis J. Herrera, The County of Santa Clara, and Los Angeles Unified School District o et al v. Toshiba Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv05230
Plaintiff: The State of California by its Attorney General Kamala D. Harris and the City and County of San Francisco Ex Rel Dennis J. Herrera, The County of Santa Clara, and Los Angeles Unified School District o , The State of Arizona by its Attorney GeneralTom Horne , The State of Arkansas by its Attorney General Dustin McDaniel and others
Defendant: Toshiba Corporation and Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Petro Computer Systems, Inc. v. Toshiba Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv05215
Plaintiff: Petro Computer Systems, Inc.
Defendant: Toshiba Corporation and Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Best Buy Co. Inc. et al v. Toshiba Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv04114
Plaintiff: Best Buy Co. Inc. , Best Buy Purchasing LLC , Best Buy Enterprise Services Inc. and others
Defendant: Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba Mobile Display Co., Ltd., Toshiba America Electronics Components Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Schultze Agency Services, LLC et al v. Hitachi, Ltd. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv02649
Plaintiff: Schultze Agency Services, LLC and Tweeter Newco, LLC
Defendant: Hitachi, Ltd., Hitachi Displays, Ltd., Hitachi America Ltd and others
Pecial_master: Charles A. Legge
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corporation et al v. Hitachi Ltd. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv02648
Plaintiff: P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corporation , Marta Cooperative of America, Inc. and ABC Appliance, Inc.
Defendant: Hitachi Ltd., Hitachi Displays, Ltd., Hitachi America Ltd and others
Pecial_master: Charles A. Legge
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Rockwell Automation Inc v. AU Optronics Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv02495
Plaintiff: Rockwell Automation Inc.
Defendant: AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America Inc, Chi Mei Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?