Cases 11 - 16 of 16
Versalles v. Eukor Car Carriers Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv02999
Plaintiff:
Lazaro Versalles
Defendant:
Eukor Car Carriers Inc., Wallenius Wilhelmsen Logistics Americas LLC, Wallenius Wilhelmsen Logistics As and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Heilicher et al v. Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha et al
as 3:2013cv03000
Plaintiff:
Matthew Heilicher , Elizabeth Powers Keller , Eric L. Meth and others
Defendant:
Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha, NYK Line (North America) Inc., Wilh. Wilhelmsen Holding ASA and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Spicer et al v. Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha (NYK Line) et al
as 4:2013cv02894
Plaintiff:
Sean Spicer , Phyllis Rosen , Gustavo Adolfo Perez and others
Defendant:
Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha (NYK Line), NYK Line (North America) Inc., Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Levis et al v. Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha et al
as 3:2013cv02895
Plaintiff:
Ashton Levis and Bruce Hertz
Defendant:
Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha, NYK Line (North America) Inc., Wilh. Wilhelmsen Holding ASA and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Martens Cars of Washington, Inc. et al v. Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha et al
as 3:2013cv02696
Plaintiff:
Martens Cars of Washington, Inc. , Hudson Charleston Acquisition, LLC , John O'Neil Johnson Toyota, LLC and others
Defendant:
Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha, NYK Line (North America) Inc., Mitsui O.S.K. Lines Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
MacQuarrie et al v. Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha et al
as 3:2013cv02409
Plaintiff:
Joan MacQuarrie and Brenda Keegan
Defendant:
Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha, NYK Line (North America), Inc., Wilh. Wilhelmsen Holding ASA and others
Movant:
Marten Cars of Washington, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
