Cases 21 - 30 of 123
Fujitsu Limited et al v. Netgear Inc
as 3:2009mc80126
Plaintiff:
Fujitsu Limited, Fujitsu Limited, Fujitsu Limited and others
Defendant:
Netgear Inc
NorthPeak Wireless, LLC v. 3Com Corporation et al
as 3:2009cv00602
Plaintiff:
NorthPeak Wireless, LLC and NorthPeak Wireless, LLC
Defendant:
3COM Corporation, 3COM Corporation, 3COM Corporation and others
Counter-claimant:
U.S. Robotics Corporation, Sony Electronics, Inc., Sony Computer Entertainment America, Inc. and others
Counter-defendant:
NorthPeak Wireless, LLC, NorthPeak Wireless, LLC, NorthPeak Wireless, LLC and others
Intervenor:
Intel Corporation
Miscellaneou:
Intel Corporation
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
KLA-Tencor Corporation v. Fujitsu Limited et al
as 5:2008cv01254
Plaintiff:
KLA-Tencor Corporation, KLA-Tencor Corporation, KLA-Tencor Corporation and others
Defendant:
Fujitsu Limited and Fujitsu Microelectronics America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
KLA-Tencor Corporation v. Fujitsu Limited et al
as 4:2008cv01254
Plaintiff:
KLA-Tencor Corporation, KLA-Tencor Corporation, KLA-Tencor Corporation and others
Defendant:
Fujitsu Limited and Fujitsu Microelectronics America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Chan v. Life Insurance Company of North America et al
as 3:2007cv06214
Plaintiff:
Andy E. Chan and Andy E. Chan
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America and Fujitsu Business Communication Systems, Inc. Long Term Disability Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits
IMCA, Inc. v. AU Optronics Corp. et al
as 3:2007cv05348
Plaintiff:
IMCA, Inc.
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corp. America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Defrancisco v. AU Optronics Corp. et al
as 3:2007cv05020
Plaintiff:
Mauricio Defrancisco and Mauricio Defrancisco
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corp. America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
Eisler v. AU Optronics Corp. et al
as 3:2007cv05019
Plaintiff:
Scott Eisler
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corp. America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Weingarten v. AU Optronics Corp. et al
as 3:2007cv04931
Plaintiff:
Marcia Weingarten, Marcia Weingarten, Marcia Weingarten and others
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corp. America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Pulasky v. AU Optronics Corp. et al
as 3:2007cv04934
Plaintiff:
John Pulasky
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corp. America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
