Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of California
Cases 1 - 10 of 59
X Corp v. Center for Countering Digital Hate, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv03836
Plaintiff: X Corp, a Nevada Corporation and X Corp
Defendant: Center for Countering Digital Hate, Inc., a Washington, D.C. non-profit corporation, Center for Countering Digital Hate Ltd., a British non-profit organization, DOES 1 through 50, Inclusive and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Su v. Environmental Instrumentation Co. et al
as 3:2023cv01824
Plaintiff: Julie A. Su
Defendant: Environmental Instrumentation Co. and Environmental Instrumentation Co. Profit Sharing Plan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Stanford Health Care v. State Farm Insurance Company
as 5:2023cv01090
Plaintiff: Stanford Health Care. A California non-profit public benefit corporation and Stanford Health Care
Defendant: State Farm Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
McClean et al v. Solano/Napa Counties Electrical Workers Profit Sharing Plan et al
as 4:2023cv01054
Plaintiff: Rodney McClean and Joanna McClean
Defendant: SOLANO/NAPA COUNTIES ELECTRICAL WORKERS PROFIT SHARING PLAN, SOLANO-NAPA COUNTIES ELECTRICAL WORKERS PENSION PLAN, THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES, SOLANO/NAPA COUNTIES ELECTRICAL WORKERS PROFIT SHARING PLAN and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits
Walsh v. Fillet et al
as 3:2023cv00167
Plaintiff: Martin J. Walsh
Defendant: Paul Fillet, PAUL G. FILLET, D.M.D., INC, PAUL G. FILLET, D.M.D., INC. PROFIT SHARING PLAN and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104 Recovery of Benefits to Employee
Stanford Health Care v. Chefs Warehouse, Inc., Welfare Benefit Plan, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv07737
Plaintiff: Stanford Health Care. A California non-profit public benefit corporation and Stanford Health Care
Defendant: THE CHEFS WAREHOUSE, INC., WELFARE BENEFIT PLAN, a California entity, TRUSTMARK HEALTH BENEFITS, a Delaware entity, Chefs Warehouse, Inc., Welfare Benefit Plan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC, et al v. Actelion Pharmaceuticals US, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv07604
Plaintiff: MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC, a Delaware Series Limited Liability Company, MSPA Claims 1, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company, MSP Recovery Claims Series 44, LLC, a Delaware Series Limited Liability Company and others
Defendant: Actelion Pharmaceuticals US, Inc., Caring Voice Coalition, Inc., an Idaho non-profit corporation, Adira Foundation, a Virginia non-profit corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Stanford Health Care v. Carefirst of Maryland, Inc.
as 5:2022cv06041
Petitioner: Stanford Health Care. A California non-profit public benefit corporation and Stanford Health Care
Defendant: CAREFIRST OF MARYLAND, INC., dba CAREFIRST BLUECROSS BLUESHIELD and Carefirst of Maryland, Inc. doing business as CareFirst BlueCross BlueShield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Berkeley Insurance Company, a Delaware corporation v. OakCare Medical Group et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv05181
Defendant: East Bay Medical Group, Inc., OakCare Medical Group, Amy Kane and others
Plaintiff: BERKLEY INSURANCE COMPANY, a Delaware corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Stanford Health Care. A California non-profit public benefit corporation v. CareFirst of Maryland, Inc.
as 5:2022cv04991
Plaintiff: Stanford Health Care. A California non-profit public benefit corporation
Defendant: CareFirst of Maryland, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?