Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Deetsch v. Lei et al
as 3:2022cv01166
Plaintiff:
Todd Deetsch
Defendant:
Peter Lei, Lumia Products Co. LLC, Amazon.com, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271 Patent Infringement
HiGear Design, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc.
as 3:2016cv01110
Plaintiff:
HiGear Design, Inc.
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271
Nova Intellectual Solutions, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc.
as 3:2016cv01014
Plaintiff:
Nova Intellectual Solutions, LLC
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271
Zipbuds, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc.
as 3:2013cv02967
Plaintiff:
Zipbuds, LLC
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Enel Company, LLC v. Schaefer et al
as 3:2012cv01369
Defendant:
Lakeland Gear, Inc., Camping World, Inc., Cabela's Incorporated and others
Counter Defendant:
Lee Cargill
Plaintiff:
Enel Company, LLC and Lee B Cargill
Cross Defendant:
Evans Loran
Cross Claimant:
Lakeland Enterprises, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271
Area 55, Inc et al v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00145
Plaintiff:
Area 55, Inc and Vinturi, Inc.
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc. , Potential Dynamix, LLC , Matthew J. Schmidt and others
Counter_claimant:
Prime Wine Products LLC. , Winemall.com, Inc. and Amazon.com, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Area 55, Inc and Vinturi, Inc.
Cross_claimant:
Amazon.com, Inc.
Cross_defendant:
This is Carmen, Inc., Cydea Inc. , Potential Dynamix, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
SPH America, LLC v. Acer, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv02535
Plaintiff:
SPH America, LLC, SPH America, LLC, SPH America, LLC and others
Defendant:
Acer, Inc., Acer America Corporation, Amazon.com, Inc. and others
Counter Claimant:
Acer, Inc., Acer America Corporation and Fujitsu America, Inc.
Counter Defendant:
SPH America, LLC, SPH America, LLC, SPH America, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
