Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Horowitz v. Bishop, White, Marshall, & Weibel, P.S. et al
as 3:2011cv01042
Plaintiff:
Nicholas A. Horowitz
Defendant:
Bishop, White, Marshall, & Weibel, P.S. and DOES
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Calhoun v. San Diego, County of
as 3:2011cv00969
Plaintiff:
Bruce Derrick Calhoun
Defendant:
San Diego, County of, Citizens Review Board on Police Practices, Pacific View Motel and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Calhoun v. San Diego, County of et al
as 3:2011cv00655
Plaintiff:
Bruce Derrick Calhoun
Defendant:
San Diego, County of, Pacific View Motel, Sicuia Dyer and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Calhoun v. San Diego, County of et al
as 3:2011cv00425
Plaintiff:
Bruce Derrick Calhoun
Defendant:
San Diego, County of, San Diego County Public Defender, C-SPAN and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Calhoun v. San Diego County et al
as 3:2011cv00109
Plaintiff:
Bruce Derrick Calhoun
Defendant:
San Diego County, Larry Allen Burns , Skomal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Branch Banking and Trust Company v. Marshall
as 3:2011mc00011
Plaintiff:
Branch Banking and Trust Company
Defendant:
Brian Marshall
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv02661
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Calhoun v. San Diego County and All of Its Corrupt Partners et al
as 3:2010cv02049
Plaintiff:
Bruce Derrick Calhoun
Defendant:
San Diego County and All of Its Corrupt Partners, Irma E Gonzalez , Dana Sabraw and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Calhoun v. San Diego County et al
as 3:2010cv01836
Plaintiff:
Bruce Derrick Calhoun
Defendant:
San Diego County, Calhoun Rich Clan, Irma E. Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cebo v. Law Offices of Marshall C. Watson
as 3:2010cv00884
Plaintiff:
Adi Cebo
Defendant:
Law Offices of Marshall C. Watson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
