Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Rozar v. First National Collection Bureau, Inc.
as 3:2012cv02890
Plaintiff:
Sarah Rozar
Defendant:
First National Collection Bureau, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Hakala et al v. National Credit Systems, Inc.
as 3:2012cv01192
Plaintiff:
Daniel Hakala and Sarah Hakala
Defendant:
National Credit Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv01066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
McDonald v. Citibank N.A et al
as 3:2012cv00958
Plaintiff:
Sarah McDonald
Defendant:
Citibank N.A and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Alto et al v. Salazar et al
as 3:2011cv02276
Plaintiff:
Albert P. Alto , Andre E. Alto , Anthony Alto and others
Defendant:
Ken Salazar , Larry Echo Hawk , Michael Black and others
Amicu:
San Pasqual Band of Mission Indians
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Anaeme v. United States of America et al
as 3:2011cv01906
Plaintiff:
Chibueze C. Anaeme
Defendant:
United States of America , San Diego County, California, San Diego County Public Defenders Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv01349
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gosling v. Groupon, Inc.
as 3:2011cv01231
Petitioner:
Sarah Gosling
Respondent:
Groupon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
IN RE: GROUPON, INC., MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION
as 3:2011md02238
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ferreira , Heather Kimel , Brian Zard and others
Defendant:
Groupon, Inc. , Nordstom Inc , DOES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Crawford v. Rea et al
as 3:2010cv00208
Plaintiff:
Douglas J. Crawford
Defendant:
William J. Rea, Jr., Timothy J. Vanden Heuvel, Knox Attorney Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
