Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Watt v. Block, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00867
Plaintiff:
Jody Watt
Defendant:
Block, Inc., Jack Dorsey, Roelof Botha and others
Talley v. Mirati Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv02055
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Talley
Defendant:
Mirati Therapeutics, Inc., Faheem Hasnain, Charles Baum and others
EpicentRx, Inc. v. Carter
as 3:2023cv01180
Petitioner:
Epicentrx, Inc.
Respondent:
Corey A. Carter
Not Classified By Court:
Genentech USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00542
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
In Re: Midland Credit Management, Inc., Telephone Consumer Protection Act Litigation
as 3:2011md02286
Plaintiff:
Alexandra Zenoniani, Heather Moynihan, Cynthia Colacchia and others
Defendant:
Unidentified Collector, Midland Funding LLC, Midland Credit Management, Inc. and others
Special Master:
Honorable Herbert B. Hoffman
Petitioner:
Eunice Brooks and Vladimir Francois
Intervenor Plaintiff:
SEAN HARTRANFT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
EpicentRx, Inc. v. Carter
as 3:2020cv01058
Defendant:
Corey A. Carter
Plaintiff:
Epicentrx, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01203
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01160
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Clemons v. Santarus, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv02995
Plaintiff:
Harold Clemons
Defendant:
Santarus, Inc. , Salix Pharmaceuticals, Ltd., Salix Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
