Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of California
Cases 11 - 20 of 33
Top Rock Construction, Inc. v. Kevcon, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00624
Plaintiff: Top Rock Construction, Inc.
Defendant: Kevcon Inc , Liberty Mutual Group Inc and Safeco Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Type: Contract Miller Act
The United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Spearhead Roofing, LLC et al v. Kevcon, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv01641
Plaintiff: The United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Spearhead Roofing, LLC and Spearhead Roofing, LLC
Defendant: Kevcon, Inc. and Safeco Insurance Company of America
Counter_defendant: Indemnity Company of California and Spearhead Roofing, LLC
Counter_claimant: Kevcon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352
Type: Contract Miller Act
Infinity Contractors International, LTD. v. Safeco Insurance Company of America
as 3:2013cv03099
Plaintiff: Infinity Contractors International, LTD.
Defendant: Safeco Insurance Company of America
Intervenor_plaintiff: Kevcon Inc
Counter_claimant: Kevcon Inc and Infinity Contractors International, LTD.
Counter_defendant: Infinity Contractors International, LTD. and Kevcon Inc
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America, for the use and benefit of Frazee Paint and Wallcovering v. Villa & Sons Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv02379
Plaintiff: United States of America, for the use and benefit of Frazee Industries, Inc.
Defendant: Villa & Sons Enterprises, Inc., Jose Villalpando and Safeco Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Miller Act
Zambrano v. Carmax Auto Superstores, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv02107
Plaintiff: Tania Zambrano
Defendant: Carmax Auto Superstores, LLC , Capital One, National Association , Safeco Insurance Company of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
United States of America for the use and benefit of Parron-Hall Corporation v. Rudolf and Sletten, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01553
Plaintiff: United States of America for the use and benefit of Parron-Hall Corporation
Defendant: Rudolf and Sletten, Inc., Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America, Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
Dahglian Grading, Inc. v. Rudolph and Sletten Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01163
Plaintiff: Dahglian Grading, Inc.
Defendant: Rudolph and Sletten Inc., Travelers Casualty and Surety of America, Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
The United States of America, for the use and benefit of Plaintiff Walden Structures, Inc. v. T.B. Penick & Sons, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv00470
Plaintiff: The United States of America, for the use and benefit of Plaintiff Walden Structures, Inc.
Defendant: T.B. Penick & Sons, Inc., Safeco Insurance Company of America and Does 1 through 50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
Safeco Insurance Company of America v. Thomas et al
as 3:2013cv00170
Plaintiff: Safeco Insurance Company of America
Defendant: Arma Thomas , Tamela Cross , Taurus Myles-Hendricks and others
Counter_claimant: Tamela Cross and Arma Thomas
Counter_defendant: Safeco Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
The United States et al v. Kevcon Inc et al
as 3:2012cv02906
Plaintiff: The United States and Peacock Engineering, Inc
Defendant: Kevcon Inc , Safeco Insurance Company of America and Does 1 through 20
Counter_claimant: Safeco Insurance Company of America and Kevcon Inc
Counter_defendant: Peacock Engineering, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?