Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Kranz et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 3:2022cv00588
Defendant:
Cameron International Corporation, Elliott Company, FMC Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Kranz and Lucinda Kranz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 as Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Walashek, et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, et al
as 3:2014cv01567
Plaintiff:
Gail Elizabeth Walashek , Michelle Walashek , Keith Walashek and others
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Alfa Laval, Inc. , Amtrol, Inc. and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Crane Co.
Thirdparty_defendant:
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Stapleton et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 3:2011cv00428
Plaintiff:
Carlos C. Stapleton and Carlotta S. Stapleton
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , Alfa Laval Inc., Campbell Industries and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Mansir et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 3:2010cv02617
Plaintiff:
William W. Mansir and Teri M. Mansir
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , Alfa Laval Inc., Brake Gate, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Stone et al v. Alfa Laval Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv02327
Plaintiff:
James W. Stone and Elsie F. Stone
Defendant:
Alfa Laval Inc., Armstrong International, Inc, Campbell Industries and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Jenkins v. Allied Packing & Supply, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv00101
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Jenkins
Defendant:
Allied Packing & Supply, Inc., A.W. Chesterton Company, Alfa Laval, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jenkins v. Allied Packing & Supply, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv01671
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Jenkins
Defendant:
Allied Packing & Supply, Inc., A.W. Chesterton Company, Alfa Laval, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
