Cases 91 - 100 of 1,189
EDST, LLC et al v. iApartments, Inc.
as 8:2022cv00272
Plaintiff:
EDST, LLC and QUEXT IoT, LLC
Defendant:
iAPARTMENTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Omnia Medical, LLC v. Painteq, LLC et al
as 8:2022cv00145
Plaintiff:
OMNIA MEDICAL, LLC
Defendant:
PAINTEQ, LLC, Sean LaNeve and Charles Girsch
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Hydropressure Cleaning, Inc. v. Blasters, Inc.
as 8:2022cv00105
Plaintiff:
Hydropressure Cleaning, Inc.
Defendant:
Blasters, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Arthrex, Inc. v. Parcus Medical, LLC
as 2:2022cv00019
Plaintiff:
Arthrex, Inc.
Defendant:
Parcus Medical, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Golden et al v. Deco Power Lift, Inc.
as 8:2022cv00044
Plaintiff:
William Golden and Golden Manufacturing, Inc.
Defendant:
Deco Power Lift, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Social Positioning Input Systems, LLC v. Click Labs, Inc.
as 8:2022cv00036
Plaintiff:
Social Positioning Input Systems, LLC
Defendant:
Click Labs, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Coretek Licensing, LLC v. Frontier Communications Corporation
as 8:2021cv03013
Plaintiff:
Coretek Licensing LLC and Coretek Licensing, LLC
Defendant:
Frontier Communications Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Swinford v. 360 Booth Inc. et al
as 8:2021cv02993
Plaintiff:
Stephen M Swinford
Defendant:
360 Booth Inc. and Jay G Smithweck
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Tetra Tech, Inc. et al v. CSX Corporation et al
as 3:2021mc00058
Plaintiff:
Tetra Tech, Inc. and Tetra Tech TAS Inc.
Defendant:
CSX Corporation and CSX Transportation, Inc.
Tetra Tech, Inc. et al v. CSX Corporation
as 3:2021cv01246
Plaintiff:
Tetra Tech, Inc. and Tetra Tech TAS Inc.
Defendant:
CSX Corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
