Cases 21 - 30 of 46
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2019cv02252
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Towles et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 8:2019cv02563
Plaintiff:
Alathea Towles and Melvin Towles
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. f/k/a Chase Bank (USA), N.A., Nationwide Credit, Inc. a/k/a NCI Holdings, LLC, Nationwide Credit, Inc. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2018cv01396
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mediator:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
White v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 8:2018cv00894
Plaintiff:
Heather White
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Webb v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 6:2018cv00379
Plaintiff:
Andrew P. Webb
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A. , JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Schomaker v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 8:2018cv00358
Plaintiff:
Michael Schomaker
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2018cv00228
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Fournier v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 8:2017cv03042
Plaintiff:
Carmela Fournier
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Gonzalez v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 8:2017cv02908
Plaintiff:
Maricel Gonzalez
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Segarra v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 8:2017cv02801
Plaintiff:
Richard Segarra
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
