Cases 41 - 50 of 92
Gray v. The City of Jacksonville, Florida et al
as 3:2016cv00554
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Marcus Gray
Defendant:
The City of Jacksonville, Florida, Douglas E. Smith, Joseph H. Sarria and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2721
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2015cv01876
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Phillips v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 8:2015cv02390
Plaintiff:
Kathy Phillips
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv01899
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv00608
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00593
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Adkins v. T-Mobile USA, Inc. et al
as 8:2014cv02554
Plaintiff:
Phillip Adkins
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc. and Convergent Outsourcing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Capitol Body Shop, Inc. et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al
as 6:2014cv06000
Defendant:
Direct General Insurance Company of Mississippi, Allstate Property and Casualty Company, Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
Crystal Car Care, Inc., Smith Brothers Collision Center, Inc., Alexander Body Shop, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2014cv01436
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2014cv01265
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
