Cases 131 - 140 of 156
Castro-Sanchez v. United States of America
as 8:2010cv00509
Plaintiff:
Jesus Castro-Sanchez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Preston v. Polk County Jail et al
as 8:2010cv00314
Plaintiff:
Sanchez Preston
Defendant:
Polk County Jail and Sheriff Grady
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez-Montes v. Sirrolli et al
as 5:2009cv00341
Plaintiff:
Ferdinand Sanchez-Montes
Defendant:
B. Sirrolli, Brad King, Edward L. Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Sanchez v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2009cv01223
Petitioner:
Valentin Sanchez
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Staten v. Lamour et al
as 2:2009cv00403
Petitioner:
Ricky R. Staten
Respondent:
Jacques Felipe Lamour and David Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez v. Rake et al
as 5:2009cv00275
Plaintiff:
Noe Sanchez, Jr.
Defendant:
Jeffery A. Rake, Mitchell R. Tucker, Daniel J. Trammell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez v. United States of America
as 8:2009cv01117
Plaintiff:
Santana Sanchez
Defendant:
United States of America and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Sanchez-Alaniz v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
as 5:2009cv00044
Petitioner:
Martin Sanchez-Alaniz
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Sanchez-Alaniz v. Kimpf et al
as 5:2009cv00039
Plaintiff:
Martin Sanchez-Alaniz
Defendant:
FNU Kimpf, FNU Drew and FNU Mecleckner
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Sanchez v. USA
as 8:2008cv02311
Plaintiff:
Selestino Sanchez, Sr.
Defendant:
USA and USA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
