Cases 51 - 60 of 73
United States of America v. Source USA, Inc.
as 8:2009cv01155
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Source USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 USA Plaintiff
USA v. $20,200,000.00
as 8:2009cv00971
Plaintiff:
USA, USA and USA
Defendant:
$20,200,000.00
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 983 Civil Forfeiture Proceedings
USA v. $134,918.10 US
as 2:2009cv00233
Defendant:
$134,918.10 US
Plaintiff:
USA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 983 Civil Forfeiture Proceedings
USA v. $568,338.29 in proceeds from the sale of real property located at 236 Acadia Terrace, Celebration, FL et al
as 8:2009cv00490
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
$568,338.29 in proceeds from the sale of real property located at 236 Acadia Terrace, Celebration, FL and $98,478.62 in proceeds from the sale of real property at 121 Celebration Boulevard, Celebration, FL
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
USA v. $605,368.21 in U.S. Currency
as 8:2008cv01146
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
$605,368.21 in U.S. Currency
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
In Re: 2008 Ford Truck, et al.
as 3:2008mc00022
USA v. $69,705.00 U.S.
as 3:2008cv00495
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
$69,705.00 U.S.
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
USA v. Abelard
as 2:2008cv00169
Plaintiff:
USA and USA
Defendant:
Alexandre Pierre Abelard
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Federal Communications Act
USA v. Wells Fargo Cashier's Check No. 0922100341 in the amount of $276,432.72
as 3:2008cv00105
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Cashier's Check No. 0922100341 in the amount of $276,432.72
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 983 Civil Forfeiture Proceedings
USA v. $178,170.64 Bank of America Cashier's Check
as 3:2007cv01085
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
$178,170.64 Bank of America Cashier's Check
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 983 Civil Forfeiture Proceedings
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
