Cases 21 - 30 of 38
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01255
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Lazenberry v. Commissioner of Social Security et al
as 3:2013cv00530
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Lazenberry
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security, SSA and Quick Builder, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Quick v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2012cv00076
Plaintiff:
Richard Lee Quick, III
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Quick v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2011cv01363
Plaintiff:
Richard Lee Quick, III
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2011cv01073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Bear v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2010cv00448
Plaintiff:
Lori Quick Bear
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2010cv00886
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Quick v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2010cv00133
Plaintiff:
Richard Lee Quick, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Quick v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2010cv00190
Plaintiff:
Richard Lee Quick, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Synergistic International, LLC v. Bondogji et al
as 8:2009cv02602
Plaintiff:
Synergistic International, LLC, Synergistic International, LLC and Synergistic International, LLC
Defendant:
Mazen Bondogji and Quick Lube Plus, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
