Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2014cv00772
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Huang v. U.S. Attorney General et al
as 6:2010cv00948
Petitioner:
Guo Zeng Huang
Defendant:
U.S. Attorney General, Acting Director of Executive Office of Immigration Review, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2009cv01912
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Puerta v. Department of Justice et al
as 6:2009cv00502
Plaintiff:
Natalia Puerta
Defendant:
Department of Justice and U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ahmad v. Attorney General of the United States et al
as 6:2008cv00416
Plaintiff:
Ghada Ahmad
Defendant:
Attorney General of the United States, Secretary of the United States Department of Homeland Security, Director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
McCann et al v. Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 6:2008cv00225
Plaintiff:
Barbara C. McCann and Saleem Sirri
Defendant:
Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Director of the U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services, Kathy Redman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Nguyen v. U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services et al
as 3:2007cv01065
Petitioner:
Cuong Viet Nguyen
Respondent:
U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services and Louise Germain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Oughza v. U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services
as 6:2007cv00070
Plaintiff:
Younes Oughza
Defendant:
U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
