Cases 31 - 40 of 45
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv02682
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Inellectual Ventures I, LLC et al v. AT&T Mobility, LLC. et al
as 6:2015mc00061
Plaintiff:
Intellectual Ventures I, LLC and Intellectual Ventures I
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility, LLC., AT&T Mobility II, LLC, New Cingular Wireless Servs., Inc. and others
Movant:
James Zyren
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Orlando Communications LLC v. ZTE Corporation et al
as 6:2015cv00360
Plaintiff:
Orlando Communications LLC
Defendant:
ZTE Corporation, ZTE USA, Inc., ZTE Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Adkins v. T-Mobile USA, Inc. et al
as 8:2014cv02554
Plaintiff:
Phillip Adkins
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc. and Convergent Outsourcing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Essex Insurance Company v. Kart Construction, Inc. et al
as 8:2014cv00356
Plaintiff:
Essex Insurance Company
Defendant:
Kart Construction, Inc., Sabre Industries, Inc., Crown Castle, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Guidance IP LLC v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
as 6:2013cv01168
Plaintiff:
Guidance IP LLC
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Owings v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
as 3:2012cv01385
Plaintiff:
Sprague Owings
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Jackson II v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
as 8:2012cv02285
Plaintiff:
Jerone Q. Jackson II
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Flores v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
as 8:2012cv01083
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Flores
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Brandywine Communications Technologies, LLC v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
as 6:2012cv00282
Plaintiff:
Brandywine Communications Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
