Cases 1 - 10 of 10
James v. Secretary, DOC et al (Lee County)
as 2:2020cv00906
Respondent:
Florida Attorney General and Secretary, DOC
Petitioner:
Antawone E. James
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
James v. Secretary Department of Corrections et al (Lee County)
as 2:2020cv00567
Respondent:
Secretary Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Petitioner:
Antawone E. James
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
James v. Secretary, DOC (Lee County)
as 2:2020cv00314
Respondent:
Secretary, DOC
Petitioner:
Antawone E. James
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Choice Hotels International, Inc. v. Allamanda Investments, LLC et al
as 6:2016cv00375
Plaintiff:
Choice Hotels International, Inc.
Defendant:
Allamanda Investments, LLC, Helen E. James, Djamwai Kwok and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
James v. Maybus
as 3:2015cv01300
Plaintiff:
Carolyn E. James
Defendant:
Ray Maybus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
James v. Quality Distribution, Inc. et al
as 8:2014cv00273
Plaintiff:
Rowland E. James
Defendant:
Quality Distribution, Inc. and Quality Carriers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
James v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2013cv00369
Petitioner:
Alvin E. James
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James v. Warden, FCC Coleman USP II
as 5:2010cv00008
Petitioner:
Joe E. James
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James v. Warden, FCC Coleman USP II
as 6:2009cv02173
Petitioner:
Joe E. James
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2009cv00176
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
