Cases 71 - 80 of 5,249
BARTON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2023cv24699
Petitioner:
EDWARD C BARTON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MOTOLO v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 3:2023cv24709
Petitioner:
PERRY FRANCIS MONTOLO and PERRY FRANCIS MOTOLO
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ANY / ALL AGENTS CONTRACTORS EMPLOYEES PRINCIPALS AND THIRD PARTY INTERVENORS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
FRANKLIN v. DIXON
as 4:2023cv00497
Petitioner:
LEON FRANKLIN, JR
Respondent:
RICKY D DIXON and STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SANTILLAN v. WINGFIELD
as 5:2023cv00308
Petitioner:
JOE RAMON SANTILLAN
Respondent:
BARRY WINGFIELD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
WADE v. DIXON
as 4:2023cv00508
Petitioner:
RANDY J WADE
Respondent:
RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RAINES v. PETERS et al
as 1:2024cv00002
Petitioner:
VINCENT KEITH RAINES
Respondent:
COLETTE PETERS, KEVIN PISTRO and MS BOZEMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
WATKINS v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 1:2023cv00268
Petitioner:
ERNEST WATKINS
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TUBBS v. DIXON
as 5:2023cv00284
Petitioner:
SHEENA LYNN TUBBS
Respondent:
RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TAVARES-PEPIN v. SOME WHITE GUY
as 1:2023cv00301
Petitioner:
Mr. Humberto Tavares- Pepin and HUMBERTO TAVARES-PEPIN
Respondent:
SOME WHITE GUY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HERRING v. DIXON
as 4:2023cv00494
Petitioner:
STEVE HERRING
Respondent:
RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
