General Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Cases 1 - 10 of 5,249
WARD v. SULSBERRY
as 4:2024cv00217
Petitioner: BRANDY LEE WARD
Respondent: SULSBERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
EVANS v. ARCH
as 3:2024cv00127
Plaintiff: ROGER VON EVANS
Defendant: CAREN L ARCH
Respondent: BROWN, RICKY DIXON and SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ELDER v. DIXON
as 3:2024cv00115
Petitioner: RICHARD ELDER
Respondent: RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TEAMER v. DIXON
as 3:2024cv00200
Petitioner: KERRICK VAN TEAMER
Respondent: RICKY S DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MCCUMSEY v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 3:2024cv00203
Petitioner: CHRISTOPHER D MCCUMSEY
Respondent: STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HUNTER v. UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE et al
as 4:2024cv00119
Petitioner: JASON HUNTER, SR
Respondent: UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, CHRISTINE PLETCHER, THEODORE JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
RUMPH v. DIXON
as 4:2024cv00191
Petitioner: TAVARES RUMPH
Respondent: RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BIVENS v. SZCZECINA
as 4:2024cv00185
Petitioner: JEROME E BIVENS
Respondent: M SZCZECINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HOWARD v. BROTON
as 4:2024cv00187
Petitioner: KIRK H0WARD
Respondent: JENNIFER A BROTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
KENON v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 4:2024cv00186
Plaintiff: CARLOS S KENON
Defendant: STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?