Cases 51 - 60 of 641
BILLEAUD v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 4:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER BILLEAUD
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MICHAEL v. DESANTIS et al
as 4:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
LINDA MICHAEL
Defendant:
RON DESANTIS, THOMAS BAKKEDAHL and CYNTHIA COX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILES v. FIDELITY CORPORATION
as 4:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MATTHEW MILES
Defendant:
FIDELITY CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COOPER v. BASFORD
as 5:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
LEMUEL L COOPER
Defendant:
JOSEPH BASFORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. DAWSON et al
as 4:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
JESSIE WIMSY JONES
Defendant:
VJ DAWSON, OFFICER L JACKSON, T SMARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. LAKE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION et al
as 4:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
JESSIE WIMSY JONES
Defendant:
LAKE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, PATRICK MAHONEY, DADE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WRIGHT v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 4:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEE WRIGHT, III
Defendant:
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, HERNANDO COUNTY SHERIFF, LIVE PD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COOPER v. DIXON et al
as 5:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
LEMUEL L COOPER
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON and HEATH HOLLAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. SOUTH FLORIDA RECEPTION CENTER et al
as 4:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
JESSIE WIMSY JONES
Defendant:
SOUTH FLORIDA RECEPTION CENTER, L JACKSON, T SMARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EVANS v. SOCIAL SECURITY OFFICE
as 3:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
ROGER VON EVANS
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
