Civil Rights Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Cases 1 - 10 of 641
WALKER v. PATE
as 5:2024cv00099
Plaintiff: AMOS WALKER
Defendant: PATE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WRIGHT III v. ESPOSITO
as 4:2024cv00212
Plaintiff: ROBERT LEE WRIGHT III
Defendant: KAREN ESPOSITO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WATSON v. WHITEFIELD
as 4:2024cv00218
Plaintiff: TYSON N WATSON
Defendant: HEATHER WHITFIELD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROSARIO v. MOODY et al
as 4:2024cv00215
Plaintiff: JEFREY ROSARIO
Defendant: ASHLEY MOODY and RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCMILLIAN v. JONES et al
as 4:2024cv00216
Plaintiff: XAVIER T MCMILLIAN
Defendant: DELDRON JONES, BRANDON GRANGER and ISAAC REDDING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VOEGELE v. DIXON
as 4:2024cv00220
Plaintiff: DILLON MATHEW VOEGELE
Defendant: RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCKENZIE v. LEWIS
as 5:2024cv00095
Plaintiff: TABITHA MCKENZIE
Defendant: VERNON LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRUM v. FLORIDA COMMISSION ON OFFENDER REVIEW et al
as 4:2024cv00210
Plaintiff: JODY MAURICE CRUM
Defendant: FLORIDA COMMISSION ON OFFENDER REVIEW, MARK HIERS, MELINDA N COONROD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRIS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 5:2024cv00094
Plaintiff: ANTHONY JAMES HARRIS
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE, UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WRIGHT v. FITZPATRICK We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2024cv00132
Plaintiff: ROBERT LEE WRIGHT, III
Defendant: MARTIN A FITZPATRICK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?