Cases 91 - 100 of 189
HOMMER v. SANDY SANSING IMPORTS INC
as 3:2014cv00650
Plaintiff:
JUERGEN J HOMMER
Defendant:
SANDY SANSING IMPORTS INC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
ARCHIE v. DOLGENCORP LLC
as 4:2014cv00533
Defendant:
DOLGENCORP LLC
Plaintiff:
DARIUS M ARCHIE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
SALAS-ALVAREZ et al v. GRAVES CREEK INC.
as 5:2014cv00323
Plaintiff:
RAMIRO SALAS-ALVAREZ, AMPARO ANTONIO BANUELOS-POSADAS, ARNULFO MARTINEZ-MORENO and others
Defendant:
GRAVES CREEK INC. doing business as WYRICK & SONS PINE STRAW
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1801
SALAS-ALVAREZ et al v. GRAVES CREEK INC.
as 4:2014cv00503
Plaintiff:
RAMIRO SALAS-ALVAREZ , AMPARO ANTONIO BANUELOS-POSADAS , ARNULFO MARTINEZ-MORENO and others
Defendant:
GRAVES CREEK INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1801
CUBIC WORLDWIDE TECHNICAL SERVICES INCORPORATED v. INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS AND AEROSPACE WORKERS AFL-CIO et al
as 3:2014cv00446
Defendant:
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS AND AEROSPACE WORKERS AFL-CIO , IAM DISTRICT LODGE NO. 75 and IAM LOCAL LODGE NO. 2902
Plaintiff:
CUBIC WORLDWIDE TECHNICAL SERVICES, INCORPORATED
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
YOUNG v. CAPSOL HOSPITALITY LLC
as 1:2014cv00132
Plaintiff:
SAKISHMIA YOUNG
Defendant:
CAPSOL HOSPITALITY LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
JONES v. GEORGIA PACIFIC WOOD PRODUCTS LLC
as 4:2014cv00353
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY JONES
Defendant:
GEORGIA PACIFIC WOOD PRODUCTS LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CRUMP v. ERIC K SHINSEKI
as 1:2014cv00056
Defendant:
ERIC K SHINSEKI
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA M CRUMP
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
GEATHERS et al v. KEISER SCHOOL INC et al
as 4:2014cv00145
Plaintiff:
JAKAYDRIA GEATHERS and MAGGIE PATTERSON
Defendant:
KEISER SCHOOL INC and EVERGLADES COLLEGE INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
GOODWIN v. DYNCORP INTERNATIONAL LLC
as 3:2014cv00116
Plaintiff:
JODY GOODWIN
Defendant:
DYNCORP INTERNATIONAL LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
