Cases 1 - 8 of 8
VEIT v. CENTENE MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLC et al
as 4:2017cv00006
Defendant:
CENTENE MANAGEMENT COMPANY, LLC, CENTENE MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLC and SUNSHINE HEALTH PLAN INC
Plaintiff:
VEIT, ANGELA B DILWORTH, JOAN FRETT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HERNANDEZ v. GADCO INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2016cv00368
Plaintiff:
EMILIO HERNANDEZ
Defendant:
GADCO INCORPORATED and JEFFERY W GUTAPFEL
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
RODRIGUEZ et al v. FLORAL TREE GARDENS INC et al
as 3:2011cv00293
Plaintiff:
RICARDO RODGRIGUEZ and EPIFANO HERNANDEZ HERMANDES
Defendant:
FLORAL TREE GARDENS INC, CLYDE HENRY PEARSON, DERECK PEARSON and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
ESPINOSA-VEGA et al v. LAND et al
as 1:2009cv00216
Plaintiff:
SOCORRO ESPINOSA-VEGA, SOCORRO ESPINOSA-VEGA, ELEAZAR GARCIA and others
Defendant:
ADRIAN I. LAND and LAND AGRI-BUSINESS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1801 Farmworker Rights
ESPINOZA-VEGA et al
as 1:2009cv00215
Plaintiff:
SOCORRO ESPINOZA-VEGA, ELEAZAR GARCIA, MAURICIO HERNANDEZ-MATIAS and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1801 Farmworker Rights
BOUCHOT et al v. GREEN-SIMMONS COMPANY, INC. et al
as 3:2009cv00434
Plaintiff:
ROY BOUCHOT, RIGO TOMAS, ZOIBER ROBLERO and others
Defendant:
GREEN-SIMMONS COMPANY, INC., ADVENTURE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., WADE ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
GARAY ROMERO et al v. CUSTOM PINE STRAW INC et al
as 4:2007cv00327
Plaintiff:
BUOMFILIO GARAY ROMERO, LUIS AGUADO HERNANDEZ, ALBERTO ARROYO FRANCO and others
Defendant:
CUSTOM PINE STRAW INC and LARRY K THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
HERNANDEZ v. CUSTOM STUCCO & DESIGN et al
as 5:2007cv00089
Plaintiff:
RICARDO HERNANDEZ
Defendant:
CUSTOM STUCCO & DESIGN and MICHAEL A LEE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
