Cases 31 - 40 of 853
DOUGHERTY v. TOTSCH et al
as 2:2023cv14193
Plaintiff:
KEVIN DOUGHERTY
Defendant:
JOHN TOTSCH, RICHARD TOTSCH, TERRY RICHARS and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Monetti v. Monetti et al
as 1:2023cv21789
Plaintiff:
Francesca Monetti
Defendant:
Sarah Monetti, Yvette Zorrilla, YVZO Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
DUBEY v. DEFENDANT "1" et al.,
as 1:2023cv21840
Plaintiff:
SHIKHA DUBEY
Defendant:
DEFENDANT "1" and John Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Joseph v. General Conference Corporation of 7th Day Adventist et al
as 1:2023cv21552
Defendant:
GENERAL CONFERENCE CORPORATION OF 7TH DAY ADVENTIST, (CGC), General Conference Corporation of 7th Day Adventist et al and others
Plaintiff:
Lorfils Joseph
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Gluck v. Oratz et al
as 1:2023cv22270
Plaintiff:
Golda Gluck
Defendant:
Pinchos Oratz, Jonathon Oratz, Avrohom Oratz and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Pierce v. Bankman-Fried et al
as 1:2023cv22206
Plaintiff:
Stephen T Pierce
Defendant:
Samuel Bankman-Fried, Caroline Ellison, Zixiao Wang and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
v. SUN et al
as 1:2023cv21854
Defendant:
DIN YUAN STEVEN SUN, DEFENDANT 1 and JOHN DOES 1- 20
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Cole v. American Medical Association
as 0:2023cv60663
Plaintiff:
Donald Merton Cole
Defendant:
American Medical Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
POLANSKY v. Defendants "1", et al
as 1:2023cv21852
Defendant:
BRUCE JAE POLANSKY, Defendant 1 and JOHN DOES 1 - 20
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Supreme Fuels Trading FZE v. Sargeant, III
as 9:2023cv80633
Plaintiff:
Supreme Fuels Trading FZE
Defendant:
Harry Sargeant, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
