Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv62388
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv62380
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv22088
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Lucas Franco v. United States of America
as 4:2019cv10102
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Jose Martin Lucas Franco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Rodriguez v. United States Attorney General et al
as 1:2017cv24675
Defendant:
United States Secretary of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Miami Field Office Director, Assistant Field Office Director and others
Plaintiff:
Raudel Franco Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bermudez-Franco v. United States Attorney General et al
as 1:2017cv23076
Plaintiff:
Maria V. Bermudez-Franco
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice and United States Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rivarola v. United States of America
as 1:2015cv22571
Plaintiff:
Franco Hernan Rivarola
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Andersen v. Secretary Florida Department of Corrections
as 1:2015cv22351
Plaintiff:
Hans Christian Andersen
Defendant:
Secretary Florida Department of Corrections, Zephyrhills C.I., Keene and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franco v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 0:2013cv60545
Plaintiff:
Inacio Franco
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Franco v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 9:2012cv80816
Plaintiff:
David Franco
Defendant:
Department of Homeland Security and Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
