Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv23838
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Navarro-Martin v. State of Florida
as 1:2022cv22799
Plaintiff:
Maria Navarro-Martin
Defendant:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Braconi v. Navarro et al
as 0:2017cv60834
Plaintiff:
Migdalia Braconi
Defendant:
Tarilika Nunez Navarro, Challae Porter, Derek Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Navarro v. United States of America
as 9:2016cv81026
Plaintiff:
William Navarro
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Navarro v. United States of America
as 0:2016cv61197
Plaintiff:
Neil Navarro
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Navarro v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv22042
Plaintiff:
Julio Enrique Navarro
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Navarro v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2016cv21919
Plaintiff:
Lazaro Tito Navarro
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections and Attorney General of the State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Navarro v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2012cv23749
Plaintiff:
Adolfo Navarro
Defendant:
Department of Corrections and Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Salazar v. U.S. Attorney General et al
as 1:2011cv20280
Plaintiff:
Guillermo Sanchez Salazar
Defendant:
U.S. Attorney General, D.E.A., F.B.I. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Osagie v. Metro Dade Corrections Department et al
as 1:2010cv20219
Plaintiff:
Victor Osagie
Defendant:
Metro Dade Corrections Department, J Navarro and Fernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
