Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Gilbert v. LEXISNEXIS Risk Solutions, FL., Inc
as 9:2024cv80051
Plaintiff:
Eric Gilbert
Defendant:
LEXISNEXIS Risk Solutions, FL., Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Soltys v. Prosegur Security USA, Inc. et al
as 0:2022cv61593
Plaintiff:
John S. Soltys
Defendant:
Prosegur Security USA, Inc. and Prosegur Global Risk Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0704 Labor Litigation
Perry v. Risk Insurance and Reinsurance Solutions, Inc.
as 1:2022cv22015
Plaintiff:
Sean Perry
Defendant:
RISK INSURANCE AND REINSURANCE SOLUTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Ingram v. Brosnan Risk Consultants, LTD
as 1:2021cv24117
Plaintiff:
Nigel Ingram
Defendant:
Brosnan Risk Consultants, LTD
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Johnson et al v. Digital Risk, LLC
as 9:2021cv80606
Plaintiff:
Kenney Jean-Gilles and Lisa Johnson
Defendant:
Digital Risk, LLC and Digital Risk Mortgage Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Baez v. High Risk Enforcement LLC et al
as 0:2020cv61967
Plaintiff:
Raymond Emmanuel Baez, Jr.
Defendant:
High Risk Enforcement LLC and Lewis Brown
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Acosta v. Brosnan Risk Consultants, LTD
as 1:2019cv21200
Defendant:
Brosnan Risk Consultants, LTD
Plaintiff:
Jesukel Acosta
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Acosta v. Brosnan Risk Consultants, LTD
as 0:2019cv60826
Defendant:
Brosnan Risk Consultants, LTD
Plaintiff:
Jesukel Acosta
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Morrison v. Digital Risk, LLC et al
as 9:2015cv80538
Plaintiff:
Ena Morrison
Defendant:
Digital Risk, LLC and Digital Risk Mortgage Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
PIKIELL-GREAVES v. DIGITAL RISK, LLC
as 9:2014cv81418
Plaintiff:
HELEN PIKIELL-GREAVES
Defendant:
DIGITAL RISK MORTGAGE SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
