Cases 91 - 100 of 204
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2015cv62236
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2015bk00614
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2015cv61830
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Bankruptcy Appeal from Judgment/Order
Olistin v. JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. et al
as 0:2015cv61795
Plaintiff:
Wilmide Olistin
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. and U.S. Bank N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Flicker et al
as 0:2015cv61728
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Michael Flicker, Joyce Flicker and JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
Edmond v. The Bank of New York Mellon et al
as 0:2015cv61254
Plaintiff:
Ron Edmond
Defendant:
The Bank of New York Mellon , Saxon Mortgage Services , Novastar Mortgage, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Munoz et al v. Nationstar Mortgage et al
as 1:2015cv22024
Plaintiff:
Ramon Munoz and Anny Munoz
Defendant:
Nationstar Mortgage and JP Morgan Chase Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bienheureuse v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 1:2015cv21831
Plaintiff:
Jean-Mary Bienheureuse
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bart-Jean v. JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. et al
as 0:2015cv60948
Plaintiff:
Marie Bart-Jean
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A., JP Morgan Chase Bank and Corporation, Seterus Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ferrer et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2015cv21709
Plaintiff:
Dora Ferrer and Manfredo Ferrer
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Federal National Mortgage Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
