Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Campagnolis v. Correct Care Solutions et al
as 4:2019cv10206
Defendant:
Amy Curry, Correct Care Solutions, Jasmyne Swain and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Martin Campagnolis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis V. Gregory et al
as 0:2019cv61431
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lewis
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions and Gregory Tony
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Olibrices v. Morales et al
as 4:2018cv10289
Defendant:
Monroe County Detention Center, Edwin Martinez, Nurse Natalie and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Olibrices
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doss v. The GEO Group Inc et al
as 9:2018cv81340
Defendant:
Warden D.L. Stine, Dr. Jules Heller, Amede, ARNP and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Scott Doss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kaiser v. Ramsay et al
as 4:2018cv10197
Plaintiff:
Hans Kaiser
Defendant:
Deputy Hillard, Correct Care Solutions, Sergeant Lawson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Murray v. Monroe County Jail et al
as 4:2018cv10189
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions and Monroe County Jail
Plaintiff:
Samuel James Murray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Riel v. Monroe County Detention Facility et al
as 4:2018cv10146
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions and Monroe County Detention Facility
Plaintiff:
George Leo Riel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leonard v. Monroe County Florida et al
as 4:2018cv10139
Defendant:
Jorge Dominicis, Employees of Monroe County Sheriff's Office, Lt. Lanares Joseph and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Daniel Leonard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Correct Care Solutions
as 4:2018cv10029
Plaintiff:
Jarnell P. Williams
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, Monroe County Detention Center and Deputy Andrews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmer v. Correct Care Solutions et al
as 1:2017cv22581
Plaintiff:
Wesley D. Simmer
Defendant:
Y. Stoker, Liu Mengmin, S. Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
