Cases 41 - 48 of 48
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009bk00003
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Bankruptcy Appeal from Judgment/Order
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv20054
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Bankruptcy Appeal from Judgment/Order
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv23683
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consol Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Bankruptcy Appeal from Judgment/Order
Murray v. Teledyne Continental Motors, Inc. et al
as 0:2009cv61644
Plaintiff:
Janice U Murray, Janice U Murray and Janice U Murray
Defendant:
Teledyne Continental Motors, Inc., Teledyne Continental Motors, Inc., Teledyne Continental Motors, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
United States of America v. One 2004 Dodge Ram 1500 Pickup et al
as 9:2008cv81138
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
One 2004 Dodge Ram 1500 Pickup, One 2006 Kawasaki Dirt Bike, One 2000 Kawasaki Dirt Bike and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Choithram Nandwani
as 1:2007mc23253
Defendant:
Ram Choithram Nandwani, Ram Choithram Nandwani and Ram Choithram Nandwani
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Ram Medical, Inc. v. STB Group International, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv23161
Plaintiff:
Ram Medical, Inc. and Ram Medical, Inc.
Defendant:
STB Group International, Inc., Banner Distributors, Inc. and Translex Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $25,762.80 et al
as 0:2007cv60339
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$25,762.80, 2004 1500 Dodge Ram Truck Quad Cab and $179,404.82
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981 Property forfeiture from criminal acts
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
