Cases 51 - 60 of 110
Roux v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2012cv23108
Plaintiff:
Howard Roux
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Cardoza and Syril
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Attorney General of the United States of America et al
as 1:2012cv22831
Plaintiff:
Alfred Wayne Lee
Defendant:
Attorney General of the United States of America , United States Department of Justice, Director of Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Austin v. Federal Bureau Of Prisons,
as 0:2012cv60714
Petitioner:
Steve Austin, Jr.
Respondent:
Federal Bureau Of Prisons,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Pace v. United States Of America Federal Bureau Of Prisons
as 1:2011cv24640
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Pace
Defendant:
United States Of America Federal Bureau Of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Iodice v. Warden Federal Bureau Of Prisons,
as 1:2011cv23886
Plaintiff:
Thomas A. Iodice
Defendant:
Warden Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ortega v. Warden, FCI, FPC Miami, Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2011cv22304
Plaintiff:
Jose Ortega
Defendant:
Warden, FCI, FPC Miami, Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lorenzo-Barreto v. Atkinson et al
as 1:2011cv21553
Plaintiff:
Hector Lorenzo-Barreto
Defendant:
Kenny Atkinson and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Alvarado v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2011cv21450
Plaintiff:
Leslie A. Alvarado
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Berenguer v. Atkinson et al
as 1:2011cv21337
Plaintiff:
Carlos Berenguer
Defendant:
Kenny Atkinson , Federal Correctional Institution , Federal Prison Camp Miami and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Baptise v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2011cv20323
Plaintiff:
Jean Baptiste
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Kenny Atkinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
