Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Hoglan et al v. Soulas et al
as 1:2024mc21627
Plaintiff:
Candyce S Hoglan, Kui Liong Lee, Kiu Liong Lee and others
Defendant:
Nicole Soulas, Frederick Soulas and Jordan Steiner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Hoglan et al v. M/V Bluefins, IMO Number 922657 et al
as 1:2024mc21628
Plaintiff:
Ju-Hsiu Jian, Jason Ruben Moreno, Christian B Stallworth and others
Defendant:
M/V Bluefins, IMO Number 922657, M/V Boceanica, IMO Number 9267132, M/V B Luminosa, IMO Number 9256016 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Jones v. GlaxoSmithKline et al
as 3:2023cv19805
Plaintiff:
Robert T Jones
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer, Rite-Aid Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Jones Brady v. United States of America
as 0:2019cv60994
Plaintiff:
Robert Charles Jones Brady
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Mid-Continent Casualty Company v. AZURE DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION GROUP, INC. et al
as 0:2016cv61187
Plaintiff:
Mid-Continent Casualty Company
Defendant:
AZURE DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION GROUP, INC. and Robert C. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Enerson v. Jones et al
as 1:2009cv20744
Plaintiff:
Robert Enerson
Defendant:
Robert C. Jones, Ronald Holmes, Sandra Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jones et al v. Bayer Corporation et al
as 9:2009cv80168
Plaintiff:
Robert M. Jones and Carol S. Jones
Defendant:
Bayer Corporation, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Bayer Schering Pharma AG
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Jones et al v. Walgreens Co.
as 0:2007mc61032
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Jones, III, Robert Lee Jones, III, Robert Lee Jones, III and others
Defendant:
Walgreens Co.
Jones et al v. Walgreens Co.
as 1:2007mc61032
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Jones, III, Robert Lee Jones, Jr. and Broadspire Management Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Walgreens Co.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
